Terror

TẠP CHÍ TIN TỨC & VĂN HÓA – VIETNAMI KULTURÁLIS FOLYÓIRAT: VƯỢT QUA NỖI SỢ HÃI ĐỂ LỰA CHỌN TỰ DO

“(NCTG) “Chủ nghĩa Hồi giáo với thế giới Phương Tây sẽ là một thách thức, tuy nhiên không nên quá sợ hãi” - nhà báo Flemming Rose, người đang bị truy đuổi và phải sống từ hàng chục năm nay dưới sự che chở của cảnh sát vì đã cho đăng những tranh biếm họa về Đấng tiên tri Muhammad…”
Read more

Gates of Vienna: Flemming Rose - We Need “Insensitivity Training”

“I will talk about free speech in the globalized world. Let me start by saying that I believe that we find ourselves in a new situation when it comes to the global debate about freedom of speech, because the debate is being driven by two new factors that didn’t used to be part of the framework within which we talked about free speech.
The new factor is technology, the digital technology. That means what is being published in a small language, in a small country that very few people would read and have access to, is now being published immediately, everywhere, and people can not only read and access it, they may also react to it even five thousand kilometers away, as we experienced it during the cartoon crisis...”
Read more

Die Welt Kompakt: "Das Land ist gespalten"

ukendtDie Welt Kompakt

Ricochet: Setting The New Yorker Straight on Freedom of Speech

“...First of all, in a time when people seem increasingly comfortable with book banning, blasphemy laws, hate speech laws, and amending the Constitution to limit the First Amendment, it’s important to take every opportunity we can to correct common misconceptions and explain some of the basics of the deep and profound philosophy behind free speech and the wisdom inherent in First Amendment law. Second, it’s important to take on the growing tide of critics, including authors and even journalists, who rely on freedom of speech but want to dismiss it as something unsophisticated or even dangerous. Whether from Eric Posner, Gary Trudeau, or Noah Feldman, there is a push to dismiss freedom of speech that seems to lionize the fact that other countries limit it. Every single one of these critics should sit down and read Flemming Rose’s book on international censorship, The Tyranny of Silence, before assuming that “enlightened censorship” is either justified or working out well for anyone.”
Read more

The Undercurrent: "There is no society that protects freedom of religion more than secular democracies"

“...Hate speech is a relatively new phenomenon. If you look at history, hate speech becomes illegal after the Second World War. I’m not in favor of hate speech. I try to talk politely with people and appreciate when they speak politely with me, but we’re living in a world that is more diverse than ever before. What is one man’s hate speech is another man’s poetry. What is sacred to one group of people will be blasphemous to another group. Hate speech laws are not actually used to combat hatred. If that was their purpose, then to be consistent they would have to criminalize a lot more speech than they in fact do. The laws are ways to force a certain group’s social conventions upon society-at-large. Hate speech laws become more problematic the more culturally diverse a democracy becomes. You can see that clearly in places like Europe, where I live. Most of Europe has laws criminalizing denials of the Holocaust. That’s one example of a hate speech law. Denying the Holocaust is stupid, it’s insulting, it’s a lie, but I don’t think we should criminalize it...”
Read the interview

El Mundo: 'Los musulmanes también están fallando a la hora de integrarse'

Hace diez años tomó una decisión que le cambió la vida. Una de tantas que a diario forjan las señas de identidad de un periódico. Flemming Rose (1958), entonces jefe de Cultura del Jyllands-Posten, quería un boceto de la autocensura en Europa y envió un e-mail a la asociación de viñetistas daneses:«Dibujad a Mahoma como lo veais». La publicación de las caricaturas incendió el planeta y dejó escaldada su propia vida, obligándolo a una rutina de escolta y semiclandestinidad. La matanza de Charlie Hebdo le devolvió primera línea de combate por la libertad de expresión, que ha protagonizado su intervención en el campus FAES y en cuya defensa justifica la publicación de los dibujos.

¿Se arrepiente de haber publicado las viñetas?
No. No creo que una caricatura valga una sola vida humana. Si te rindes a la intimidación y a la violencia, envías el mensaje de que ambas funcionan. Yo no pedí librar esta batalla, me vino impuesta. Esos dibujos no se publicaron para ofender a los musulmanes, sino para preguntar si existe la autocensura y si está basada en el miedo. Diez años después, la respuesta es sí.
Tras la masacre de Charlie Hebdo, ¿cree que ha aumentado esa autocensura?
Creo que en algunas cuestiones hay más, pero también hay individuos luchando contra ella. En el caso de mi periódico no publicamos caricaturas de Mahoma desde 2008 por cuestión de seguridad. La gente no lo sabe, pero desde hace ocho años el periódico y empleados como yo o Kurt Westergaard [autor de la viñeta de Mahoma con una bomba en el turbante] hemos sufrido entre cinco y diez atentados fallidos.
La policía ha interrumpido dos veces la entrevista para conocer exactamente su ruta de hoy. ¿Vive así todos los días?
Sí, y es muy difícil acostumbrarse a coordinar la vida con la policía. Intento tener presente que esto ocurre porque hay personas que quieren matarme.
Dice que la matanza de Charlie Hebdo no le sorprendió... ¿Hay que acostumbrarse?
No creo que la amenaza se disipe, sino al contrario. Antes venía sobre todo en forma de ataques suicidas; ahora, como hemos visto en Túnez, llega de alguien que arranca a disparar en la playa o una tienda. Habrá más ataques, es parte de una batalla de ideas sobre lo que significa vivir en una sociedad multicultural y multirreligiosa...
Read more

Foundation for Responsible Television: Freedom of the Press in a World of Intolerance

“...The cartoons became a lightning rod. Rose says, “I cannot exercise my profession without freedom of the Press. My safety? I will always have a security problem for the rest of my life. I’m in the top 10 Al Qaida hit list...”
Rose travels debating these issues and has arrived at the conclusion that this is a global issue and a growing problem. He wrote his book Tyranny of Silence, to explain his decisions and offer a perspective on free speech and censorship...”
Read more

Buitenland: Deense publicist Mohammed-cartoons in Nederland

“...Flemming was in Den Haag om het eerste exemplaar van het boek 'Freedom of Speech under attack’ (de Vrijheid van het woord in gevaar) in ontvangst te nemen, samengesteld door rechtswetenschapper en publicist Afshin Elian en rechtsfilosoof Gelijn Molier van de Universiteit van Leiden.
Flemming zelf schreef het boek 'The Tyranny of Silence’ (de Tirannie van de stilte) waarin hij onder andere stelt dat hij na de publicatie van de Mohammed -cartoons, wereldwijd als de Deense Satan werd beschouwd. Hij ondervond weinig sympathie van onder andere Bill Clinton en de universitaire wereld kort na publicatie van de cartoons in zijn krant. 
Flemming Rose is nog steeds één van Europa’s prominente doelwitten van Al Qaeda. Hij heeft hierdoor beperkte bewegingsvrijheid. Het maakt hem niet minder strijdbaar, integendeel.
In EenVandaag een interview met Flemming Rose.”
Read more

Elsevier: Lafheid kwam bij vrijheidslezing in De Balie uit onverwachte hoek

“...In zijn boek Tyranny of Silencevertelt Flemming Rose - chef buitenland van Jyllands-Posten, de Deense krant die de Mohammedcartoons plaatste - een interessant verhaal over een Iraanse man.
Een 76-jarige Iraniër gooide in februari 2006 een molotovcocktail naar de Deense ambassade in Teheran. Dat deed hij omdat hij boos was over Westergaards Mohammedcartoon. Hij had die bewuste tekening zelf niet gezien...”
Read more

Toronto Sun: The silence is deafening

“...Rose’s book, THE TYRANNY OF SILENCE: HOW ONE CARTOON IGNITED A GLOBAL DEBATE ON THE FUTURE OF FREE SPEECH, chronicles the story behind the publication of the Mohammed cartoons, along with Rose’s attempt to understand the events that followed their publication.
Although the book was published in November, 2014, there has been silence from most Canadian media sources on it.
There have been no references to the book, for example, in the four Toronto daily newspapers until my column, today.
The Economist listed it as one of the best books of 2014.
Yet it has received scant attention internationally...”
Read more

TIME: Don’t Let Terrorists Determine the Limits of Free Speech

“...What is important is that the mere possibility of sharing ideas has been seriously limited due to terrorist attacks. Unfortunately, terrorism works in this way. Terrorists hate freedom. Their attacks target our culture of equality, religious freedom, freedom of expression, and tolerance.
In The Netherlands, the 4th of May is a day on which we remember those who lost their lives during World War II. After World War II, Europeans pledged to defend freedom. It’s a dark coincidence that on this year’s 4th of May we witnessed a terrorist attack at an event dedicated to free speech, where a Dutch politician made use of one of his rights: the right to speak freely, even about controversial matters. In his brilliant book The Tyranny of Silence, Flemming Rose—whose newspaper published the Danish Muhammad cartoons years ago—asks politicians and intellectuals to join a quest for freedom and to offer protection to those who live under threat. Tyranny can only win when we accept its victory; it takes courage to be free...”
Read more

The Dallas Morning News: Our Q&A with Flemming Rose

“Few people in the world know the price of free speech better than Flemming Rose, the editor at Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten who invited illustrators to send in depictions of the prophet Muhammad in 2005. Muslims around the world were enraged, and more than 200 deaths were attributed to protests surrounding what came to be known as the “cartoon crisis.” Today, Rose, 57, lives under guard. He is among figures, including novelist Salman Rusdie and the staff of French satire magazine Charlie Hebdo, who landed on extremists’ death list. Rose met with Points in Dallas recently to talk about his book, The Tyranny of Silence, published last year, and his thoughts on how the ideal of free speech is evolving around the world.”
Read the interview

De Telegraaf: Vrijheid van meningsuiting onder vuur

“Afshin Ellian sprak bij de uitreiking van het eerste exemplaar van de bundel ‘Freedom of Scpeech under Attack’ aan Flemming Rose in Den Haag de volgende rede uit: Waarom worden we hier zo zwaar beveiligd? Wie zijn wij eigenlijk? Wij allen zijn hele gewone mensen. En dit boek is een heel gewoon academisch boek. Onze gast, die wij vandaag eren, is eveneens een heel gewone man. Flemming Rose is een intellectueel uit Denemarken.”
Read more

De Volkskrant: 'Ik heb echt alle begrip voor zelfcensuur'

'Ik heb echt alle begrip voor zelfcensuur'
De man achter de Mohammedcartoons laat weer van zich horen. 'Mensen zijn bang,wees daar eerlijk over.’..
Read more

De Morgen: Interview with Flemming Rose "Eén ding is zeker: ik houd mijn mond niet"

“Flemming Rose is de voormalige chef kunst van de Deense krant Jyllands-Posten. Hij was het die in 2005 twaalf cartoonisten vroeg een paar cartoons te tekenen over de profeet Mohammed. Enkelen onder hen stierven begin dit jaar bij de aanslag op Charlie Hebdo. Toch weigert hij te zwijgen.”
Read online

European Students for Liberty in Berlin 2015: Flemming Rose "Free Speech in a Globalized World"

Flemming Rose "Free Speech in a Globalized World" at the European Students for Liberty in Berlin 2015
Watch the video

Lampadia: La autocensura se impone en Europa, Cajamarca y Arequipa

“La Tiranía del Silencio”, del danés que publicó a Mahoma con un turbante-bomba
La autocensura se impone en Europa, Cajamarca y Arequipa
“Yihadistas quieren asesinarme. Pero me niego a ser condenado a una tiranía del silencio sepulcral”, sostiene con serena valentía Flemming Rose, el editor danés que publicara el 2005 en la revista Jyllands-Posten unas caricaturas satíricas sobre el Islam, entre ellas, una en que se ve a Mahoma escondiendo una bomba en su turbante. Esta decisión le valió a Rose que fuera sentenciado a muerte por Al Qaeda y por grupos radicales islamistas.
Pero aparte de estar en esta lista negra y vivir temiendo ser asesinado, “Rose ha sido llamado un nazi, un odiador de musulmanes y un Satanás danés. Ha convivido de manera simultánea con las amenazas de muerte y cargado con las ‘culpas’ por la muerte de 200 o más personas en todo el mundo musulmán que protestaron por la publicación de las caricaturas. Desde entonces, el periodista danés ha estado en el centro de las discusiones entre el respeto a la diversidad cultural y la protección de las libertades democráticas, en especial las de la libertad de expresión”, señala en la introducción.
autocensura(1)
Read more
 

FIRE: A ‘Global First Amendment’

“...Though I have been concerned about the international scene for free speech for some time (especially as American academics often like to use free speech restrictions in other countries as a way of arguing that America is somehow behind the times and less sophisticated), my concerns gained new urgency after reading Flemming Rose’s important, and, at times, frightening, new book The Tyranny of Silence. If you are concerned about threats to free speech both abroad and also on the horizon in the U.S., Rose’s book is a must read..”
Read more

Council for Secular Humanism: Deadly Serious

“Published before the Islamic attack on the office of Charlie Hebdo, this book takes on even greater relevance in the massacre’s wake.”
Read more
Review

Lampadia.com: “Cada vez más gente cree que tiene derecho a no ser ofendida”

“...¿A qué cree que se debe este fenómeno de autocensura?
Bueno yo lo llamo “fundamentalismo de agravio”. Cada vez más gente sinceramente cree que tiene derecho a no ser ofendida. En una democracia se tiene varios derechos: votar, libertad de religión, de movimiento etc., pero el único derecho que no se debería tener es el de no ser ofendido. Pero más gente cree que tiene ese derecho y ‘juega’ la carta de la ofensa cada vez más. En todo el mundo...

Creo que se basa en políticas de identidad, ya que a las personas en un mundo globalizado les resulta muy difícil responder a la pregunta: “¿Quién soy?”. Todos buscamos identidades para protegernos y tener un sentido propio. Cuando encontramos una identidad, la queremos proteger contra cualquier ofensa. El resultado es que al final se vuelve más importante qué nos distingue de los demás que aquello que compartimos con otros seres humanos. En mi libro exploro mi experiencia con este fenómeno, pero no me limito a Dinamarca o Europa. Se trata de lo que pasa en otras partes del mundo con distintas religiones e ideologías y sobre distintos períodos de la historia. Sobre las guerras de la religión en Europa, sobre el comunismo en Rusia soviética, la Alemania de Weimar y diferentes episodios históricos en los que se revisa la libertad de expresión, las limitaciones de esta y, más ampliamente, de la libertad.”
Read more

wazne-sprawy.pl: Wolność słowa a mowa nienawiści

“Prawie 10 lat temu duńska gazeta “Jyllands-Posten” opublikowała kilkanaście karykatur Mahometa. Dziennikarze i graficy dostali wyroki śmierci od różnych islamistycznych ugrupowań. Aresztowano ludzi, którzy chcieli przeprowadzić zamachy na redakcję.
Niedawno Flemming Rose, ówczesny redaktor działu kultury “J-P”, który podjął decyzję o publikacji karykatur, wydał w USA książkę „ The Tyranny of Silence”, w której broni prawa do wolności słowa, wypowiadając się przeciwko przepisom o tzw. mowie nienawiści, obowiązującym we wszystkich państwach europejskich, w tym w Polsce.
Wprowadzenie tych przepisów było wynikiem Holocaustu – uznano w Europie, że dla zapobiegania aktom ludobójstwa należy ograniczyć możliwość publicznego nawoływania do nienawiści wobec pewnych zbiorowości, bo następstwem tej nienawiści może być fizyczna przemoc, być może śmiercionośna, wobec tych grup...”
Read more

UPJF: France Charlie-Hebdo, grand blessé de guerre Par Ivan Rioufol

“...Il faut se souvenir, comme le rappelle Flemming Rose dans son livre dont rend compte Michèle Tribalat dans la dernière revue de l’Institut d’histoire sociale, que les violences suscitées par les caricatures danoises (singulièrement celle de Kurt Westergaard représentant le prophète avec une bombe dans son turban) avaient été tout sauf spontanées. Le monde musulman et l’Organisation de la conférence islamique (OCI) en tête, y avaient vu l’opportunité de faire avancer leur campagne contre le blasphème. La Commission des droits de l’homme de l’Onu y prêta son appui en recommandant aux Etats de "combattre et punir toute tentative visant à assimiler l’islam à la violence et au terrorisme". L’Union européenne emboîta le pas, avec le commissaire aux affaires étrangères, Javier Solana, qui négocia avec l’OCI un accord appelant au bannissement de la diffamation des religions. Heureusement, des désaccords internes empêchèrent l’Europe d’être représentée au Qatar pour la signature (février 2006) de ce document avalisé par l’Espagne, la Turquie et Kofi Annan, secrétaire de l’ONU. Quand, mardi, le président d’honneur du Conseil français du culte musulman, Mohamed Moussaoui, reproche au président du Conseil représentatif des institutions juives de France, Roger Cukierman, d’avoir dit la veille que les islamistes qui prennent les juifs pour cibles sont des musulmans, c’est cette même dialectique du déni qui est appliquée. Elle vise à rendre l’islam intouchable et à réduire la liberté d’expression. Cette mise en scène d'une culpabilisation dans l'usage du mot juste est une autre forme d’intimidation, qui dépasse la seule caricature du prophète. Une démocratie digne de ce nom oblige chacun à résister à cet engrenage... “
Read more

AIDemocracy.org: How are the Changes in Media Affecting Media Freedom?

“...Another important idea connected to a more accessible medium of news has been mentioned by Flemming Rose, the Danish editor who made the decision to publish cartoons depicting Muhammed in 2005, igniting a global debate that left protesters around the world dead. Publishing the cartoons has led to threats from Muslim governments, a fatwa issued against Rose, and repeated terrorist attempts against the paper itself. In a recent interview, he said the most important thing he had learned from the ten-year debate on the cartoons was that in this age of widely accessible Internet, contexts are lost.[
Without making a judgment on his actions in 2005, he brings up a critical point about the broader audience that can now be reached by local publications. Rose had allowed the cartoons to be published through his Danish magazine and for the Danish debate on free speech. The cartoons were interpreted differently in every country they reached, because they arrived solely as pictures, without the environment in which they were originally published. Many were unaware that in addition to mocking Islam, Charlie Hebdo cartoons mocked Catholicism, the French government, and Judaism. Cross-cultural media have stifled the debate on the limits of “free speech.”
Read more

Le Figaro: Charlie-Hebdo, grand blessé de guerre

“..La peur, compréhensible, est forcément omniprésente, même si elle n’est pas dite. Flemming Rose, qui fut à l’origine des premières caricatures danoises de Mahomet parues en 2006 dans le Jyllands-Posten, l’assume pour sa part, quand il reconnaît que son journal ne poursuivra plus dans cette voie (1) : "Nous devons dire que nous ne publions pas parce que nos avons peur". Disons-le : le terrorisme islamiste a emporté une première victoire en imposant l’autocensure sur Mahomet. Cependant, aller plus loin dans l’accommodement et l’apaisement avec l’islam radical serait, pour la France, rendre les armes face à un totalitarisme. Le régime nazi savait lui aussi imposer cette même terreur...”
Read more

THE Institute of Race Relations: Flemming Rose and the absence of empathy

“...To a great extent, many of the stories touched upon by Flemming Rose in The Tyranny of Silence[1] as issues of free speech are uncomplicated, and it is easy to agree wholeheartedly with his concern. They go to the remote corners of the former Soviet Union in time and space, Hitler’s Nazism, 9/11 in New York and Washington and the Madrid bombings. Rose travels widely, conducts countless interviews and, by introducing his humble social background and family story, evokes sympathy for a man who wrestles with his own new importance and global reputation...”
Read more

CNN: Danish journalist under threat: I will not give in

Brooke Baldwin speaks to journalist Flemming Rose, culture editor of Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, who published drawings of Prophet Mohammed in 2005.
Watch the video

WorldPost: Why I Published Cartoons of Muhammad and Don't Regret It

“...Back in 2005, I was trying to cover a story about self-censorship and fear among writers, artists, museums, publishers, comedians and other people in cultural life in Denmark and Western Europe. A children's writer had made headlines when he claimed that he had difficulties finding an illustrator for a book about the life of the Prophet Muhammad; the reason, he said, was fear. That was the starting point for a debate about self-censorship in dealing with Islam. Several other examples followed. In one example, a Danish comedian admitted he was afraid of mocking Islam the same way he did with Christianity. In another, two imams called on the Danish government to pass laws criminalizing criticism of Islam.
This last example added another dimension to the debate. What do you do when people adhering to a faith or ideology insist that others with different convictions submit themselves to taboos outside sacred places?”
Read more

The Guardian: "A Europe without blasphemy is back in the middle ages..."

“...Though the Copenhagen attack was a shock, it didn’t come as a surprise. As French cartoonist Plantu told me recently when we were chatting in his office at Le Monde in Paris: “This is just the beginning. There will be more attacks.” Unfortunately, I think he is right. This will be a long battle, first and foremost a battle of ideas. The erosion of the crucial distinction between words and deeds – between an image that some may find offensive and actual violence – has created a climate in which “blasphemers” are required to bear responsibility for violent attacks subsequently directed against them. I experienced that myself in 2006 after commissioning drawings of Muhammad published in the Jyllands-Posten newspaper in Denmark, and I have tried to explain the mechanisms at work in my book The Tyranny of Silence: How One Cartoon Ignited a Global Debate on the Future of Free Speech. There are people who seriously believe that the organisers of the Copenhagen debate asked for trouble. This is partly due to a new grievance fundamentalism. It heightens the sense of insult and offence, according it enormous social power.”
Read more

MSNBC: Danish editor: We must grow thicker skins

Danish editor: We must grow thicker skins
Jyllands-Posten is a Danish daily newspaper known for having published twelve cartoons of the Prophet. Editor Flemming Rose made the decision to publish the cartoons, and he joins Morning Joe to discuss.
Watch the video

Background Briefing with Ian Masters: The Publisher of the Danish Cartoons That Caricatured the Prophet; A World-Renowned Islamic Scholar on Recent Terror in the Name of Islam

“...Since Flemming Rose made the decision to publish the cartoons, we discuss the decision to hold a public event “Art, Blasphemy, and Freedom of Expression” in a Copenhagen café with the controversial Swedish Cartoonist Lars Vilks who also caricatured Muhammad, that provoked a terrorist attack which left a film director at the cafe and a Jewish guard at a synagogue dead. In discussing freedom verses censorship, we look into whether restrictions should be put into place to prevent young European Muslims from being radicalized in prison as was the case with the terrorists responsible for the recent massacres in Paris and the young Danish-born terrorist who was just released from jail two weeks ago...”
Listen to full program

The New Yorker: Copenhagen, Speech, and Violence

“Several weeks ago, New Yorker cartoon editor Bob Mankoff conducted the following interview with Flemming Rose, the foreign editor of Jyllands-Posten, the Danish daily newspaper known for having published twelve cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad in 2005. Rose, who was then the culture editor, made the decision to publish the cartoons, which sparked attacks and violent protests across the Muslim world, and multiple terrorist plots against Jyllands-Posten, Rose, and other staff members.

Rose’s book, “The Tyranny of Silence,” was published late last year in the U.S. Rose and Mankoff spoke about the book and Rose’s views on free speech in person, and continued their conversation via e-mail. This interview is an edited version of their exchanges. Mankoff spoke to Rose today, shortly after a shooting attack on a Copenhagen café. The café was hosting a public event, “Art, Blasphemy, and Freedom of Expression,” featuring the artist Lars Vilks, who has also caricatured Muhammad. One person was killed and three were reported injured. Rose, who said he was not at the event, declined to comment at this time.
Read more

DR.DE Mediathek video: Dänemark Verzicht auf Pressefreiheit

Das Magazin euroblick hat sich zum Ziel gesetzt, europäische Zusammenhänge am anschaulichen Beispiel zu erklären und dabei die farbigen Unterschiede europäischer Regionen lebendig darzustellen. Der Blick auf Land und Leute innerhalb Europas hat dabei einen besonderen Stellenwert. Ziel ist es, Verständnis für ein zusammenwachsendes Europa zu schaffen.
Moderation: Natalie Amiri Autor: Gerhard Losher Redaktion: Gerhard Losher
Watch the video

The Washington Diplomat: Author Slams ‘Tyranny of Silence’ Surrounding Islamic Cartoon Crisis

“...Rose laments that the violence has succeeded in shutting down free speech and scaring journalists. After last month’s Paris attacks, dozens of newspapers, magazines and websites around the world reproduced the very cartoon that had so angered the terrorists who ultimately took the lives of 17 people. Notably, Jyllands-Posten, the Copenhagen paper where Rose works, wasn’t among them.
“We caved in and we’ve been very honest about it,” Rose told BBC-TV on Jan. 14, a week after the carnage in Paris. “Sometimes, the sword is mightier than the pen. We have been living with death threats and several foiled terrorist attacks in my own office for the past nine years. Perhaps if the reaction worldwide had been a little bit different in 2006 — if we had received stronger support from media organizations insisting that this is something we have the right to do, even though you may disagree with what we did — we would not have been in the situation we are now.”
Rose said it’s obvious there’s still a lack of understanding of the reasoning that goes into editorial decisions...”
Read more

The Tribune Papers: Be Offended: Vive La Resistance

“...Before Charlie Hebdo, Flemming Rose authored The Tyranny of Silence: How One Cartoon Ignited a Global Debate on the Future of Free Speech. Flemming is fighting against the growing psychosis of victimhood where, “it can be difficult to figure out the difference between an offensive cartoon or movie and committing mass murder. . . . It amounts to giving people who feel like reacting with violence a free hand to decide whether speech incites terror.”
Rose coins the phrase “grievance fundamentalism” to describe the syndrome where victims of assault are “deemed to have been asking for it.” Claiming we need more “insensitivity training,” he writes, “The only right we do not and should not have in a liberal democracy is a right not to be offended.”
Walter Olson, known best for his advocacy of tort reform, argued, “One way we can honor Charb, Cabu, Wolinski, Tignous, and the others who were killed Wednesday is by lifting legal constraints on what their successors tomorrow can draw and write.”
Read more

Die Welt: Muslime, traut euch doch, über Mohammed zu lachen!

“...Erst Jahre später, und nachdem ich anfing, mich kritisch mit dem Islam auseinanderzusetzen, erkannte ich, wie wichtig Satire sein konnte. Die dänischen Mohammed-Karikaturen im Jahre 2005 spielten bei meinem Sinneswandel eine wichtige Rolle. Massen von Muslimen gingen auf die Straße und wollten ihre Liebe zum Propheten dadurch zum Ausdruck bringen, indem sie westliche Botschaften anzündeten. Über 150 Menschen starben bei Unruhen. Kaum jemand wagte es zu sagen, dass der Tod von so vielen Menschen viel schlimmer ist als eine satirische Zeichnung des Propheten.”
Read more

eltiempo.com.ve: Y el hombre creó a Dios

“...“En este país (Inglaterra) la cobardía intelectual es el peor enemigo al que han de enfrentarse periodistas y escritores en general. Es un hecho grave que, en mi opinión, no ha sido discutido con la amplitud que merece”, señala Orwell.   
En septiembre de 2005, la urgencia de frenar las crecientes concesiones de los medios occidentales a la política de silencio informativo propugnada por fundamentalistas islámicos animó a Flemming Rose, responsable de la sección de Cultura del diario danés Jyllands Posten, a contratar once viñetas acerca del islam.    
Con esta iniciativa, Flemming Rose demostraba a la opinión pública nacional e internacional que aún existían publicaciones y artistas dispuestos a asumir el costo político de defender el principio de la libertad de expresión, entre ellos Kurt Westergaard, autor de la caricatura más controversial de la muestra, en la que aparecía un hombre con facciones árabes ataviado con un turbante bomba...”
Read more   

The College Fix: Editor who first ran Mohammed cartoons says identity politics is eroding free speech

“...Freedom of expression worldwide is under attack from identity politics, the Danish newspaper editor who first published cartoons of Mohammed 10 years ago told a Rutgers University event Thursday night.
Flemming Rose is promoting his new book, The Tyranny of Silence, which illustrates the greater debate surrounding free speech in light of religious extremism, political power and an increasingly globalized world. It was published less than two months before the massacre of journalists at French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo.
The anti-religion bent of the panel discussion, which featured other free-speech activists, rubbed some students the wrong way. Though there were no visible protests, security was tight at the event...”
Read more

Publishers Weekly: Four Questions for...Flemming Rose

“...The U.S. media have obviously decided to censor themselves when it comes to religion and they insist that it isn’t a free speech issue. It’s just decent behavior. I am not convinced. It’s fine with me when media do not want to offend, but then they should be consistent in applying that principle. .... I think the motive behind editorial decisions not to publish Mohammad cartoons is fear, and it would make the public debate about free speech a lot easier if editors were more honest about their motives...”
Read more

The Comics Journal: Cartoons of Mass Destruction: The Whole Story Behind the Danish 12

“In 2006, 12 Danish cartoonists controversially drew pictures of Muhammad at the urging of Flemming Rose, the culture editor of the Danish weekly Jyllands-Posten. This news story from The Comics Journal #275 (April 2006) offers a multitude of perspectives — from cartoonists, Danes, Muslims, Danish Muslims — and is being rerun to help supply context for the Charles Hebdo killings.
Michael Dean and R.C. Harvey, with the assistance of Eric Millikin and Houria Kerdioui”
Read more

Al Jazeera America: Flemming Rose talks to Antonio Mora

“...Let's go back a decade, when you were thinking about publishing these cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad. You had seen self-censorship happening throughout Europe and in different situations. And the straw that broke the camel's back for you was a man who wanted to write this and couldn't find an illustrator to draw the prophet for this children's book. So what was your intent, then? Because you went out and you invited people, cartoonists throughout Denmark, someone to come up with these drawings. What was your intent behind that invitation and then the subsequent publication?
I think there were two issues. In fact, we were not sure about how wide a problem self-censorship was. We had this one case. So one person self-censorship in fact taking place when it comes to dealing with Islam? And if it is taking place, is it based [on] a fiction of the mind or of our imagination, or is it based in real fear? And nine years after the fact, we have to acknowledge that we received an affirmative answer to both questions.”
Read more and watch the video

The New York Review of Books: Defying the Assassin’s Veto Timothy Garton Ash

“...Most striking was the case of Jyllands-Posten, the paper that published the original “Danish cartoons” of Muhammad in 2005. Whereas many Danish papers republished the Charlie Hebdo ones, Jyllands-Posten did not, citing its “unique position” and concerns for employees’ safety. Flemming Rose, the man who commissioned the original cartoons and is now the paper’s foreign editor, told the BBC frankly, “We caved in.” “Violence works,” he added, and “sometimes the sword is mightier than the pen.”
He thus strikingly answered an appeal made by the British columnist Nick Cohen in a panel discussion at The Guardian: “If you are frightened, at least have the guts to say that. The most effective form of censorship is one that nobody admits exists.” As if in response, the Financial Times columnist Robert Shrimsley would next day write: “I am not Charlie, I am not brave enough.” (In the meantime, there has developed a rather tiresome subgenre of “I am not Charlie” prose.) While accusations of cowardice whizz around the Internet, I would like to see the person—probably an anonymous blogger, personally risking nothing—who charges Flemming Rose with cowardice. Whatever you think of the wisdom of his commissioning the Danish cartoons back in 2005, cowardly it was not...”
Timothy Garton Ash
February 19, 2015 Issue
Read more

Alberni Valley Times: Governments should protect free speech

“...It wasn't always that way. There was a time when speech was protected from death threats, when physical force was the only way an individual's rights could be violated; when as children, we were taught "Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never harm me."
In the book "Tyranny of Silence" by Flemming Rose, the editor who published the controversial Danish cartoons writes about the history of free speech. He describes some of the atrocities committed when religion had full control of our lives. And when finally, in the 16th century, the English enlightenment provided us with the legal framework for freedom of speech, showing there is a vast difference between force and words. Most of the Islamic extremist-lead atrocities have occurred since Iran's religious leader called for the death of "Satanic Verses" author Salman Rushdie.
They fear our free speech, not our retaliatory defence. If the Muslim extremist world valued life they would stop brutalizing and killing their own people. They find our criticism intolerable...”
Read more

The Cato Institute: Hard Choices

“...It’s disconcerting for a publisher to discover that a horrific tragedy has made one of its current titles more relevant. But that’s what happened to the Cato Institute when 11 journalists at Charlie Hebdo and a police officer were murdered by Islamist extremists.
In November, we published The Tyranny of Silence, by Flemming Rose, the editor at the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten.Rose stirred up controversy in 2005 by publishing cartoons of Muhammad that led to protests, petitions, and an investigation by Danish prosecutors. More tragically, there were death threats to Rose and the cartoonists, an armed intruder in cartoonist Kurt Wester-gaard’s house, and more than 200 deaths in riots and violence in the Middle East and Africa.
Rose published the Danish edition of Tyranny of Silence, a book about the controversy and the future of free speech, in 2010. I was surprised to discover in 2013 that the manuscript had been translated into English but had not found a publisher. I brought it to the attention of John Samples, the editor-publisher of Cato Institute Press, who began to explore publication.
We had three questions in mind: safety, of course; the quality of the manuscript; and whether Rose was anti-|Muslim or genuinely an advocate of free speech and provocative journalism.
We determined that the publication of the book had not generated any violence in Denmark, and that the controversy over the cartoons had generally subsided in the nine or so years since they had been published. The manuscript was compelling, well written, and well translated. And my contacts in Denmark and Europe assured me that Rose was a genuine liberal with a strong anti-authoritarian bent, sharpened during his years as a reporter in the Soviet Union.
Given all that, the book was a natural fit for the Cato Institute. Since our founding in 1977, we’ve been committed to the libertarian values of individual liberty, limited government, free markets, and peace. We take our name from Cato’s Letters, a series of 18th-century newspaper essays by John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon that were enormously influential in shaping the ideas of the American Revolution. In essay #15, they set out one of their basic principles: “Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as publick liberty…. In those wretched countries where a man can not call his tongue his own, he can scarce call any thing else his own.”
Read more

The Guardian: After the Paris attacks we’re in danger of abandoning the right to offend

“...First, the misunderstandings. Sensitivities vary but mine is that Charlie Hebdo has never been racist or anti-Muslim; anticlerical, certainly. But there has been a great deal of incomprehension about it based simply on ignorance. One example: the cartoon representing the prophet Muhammad lying naked on his stomach, saying to a cameraman, “Do you like my bum?” Some saw this as pornography, even sodomy. The reference is, in fact, to a scene from a 1963 Jean-Luc Godard movie featuring a naked Brigitte Bardot. Anyone who knows the movie knows the cartoon is about a softly erotic scene, with no aggressive pornography involved. The artist who drew it – and cartoons do stand somewhere between comment and art – was trying to say, “Dare I do this? Yes, I do.” I can see a problem from a religious standpoint – that of blasphemy: Muhammad is depicted. Yet this is one case where Charlie Hebdo is judged to have been outrageous and beyond decency.
Sensitivities can be inflamed by misunderstandings, but sometimes by deliberate manipulation. In his book Tyranny of Silence Flemming Rose, the editor who commissioned 12 cartoons depicting the prophet for the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten in 2005, describes how that episode began. After the cartoons were published a delegation of Danish imams travelled to the Middle East with a dossier intended to arouse hatred and anger. The file included drawings that were never run, nor commissioned by Jyllands-Posten, including some pornographic ones and a picture of a man disguised as a pig, which was taken at a French rural festival. This aroused public anger, and subsequently there were violent incidents and dozens of deaths. Had the dossier been a faithful representation, would that have been the case?”
Read more

Em VEJA desta semana: A expressão não pode ter limites

“Era fim de tarde de uma terça-feira, há seis anos, quando o telefone tocou. Uma voz que havia se tornado familiar, do Serviço de Segurança e Inteligência da Dinamarca, disse que dois homens que planejavam me assassinar tinham sido presos em Chicago. O FBI havia frustrado outro ataque planejado ao meu jornal, Jyllands-­Posten, que tinha como alvos específicos a mim e o cartunista Kurt Westergaard. Os terroristas eram um americano e um canadense, ambos de origem paquistanesa. Um estava ligado a atrocidades no ano anterior em Mumbai. Ele já havia visitado a Dinamarca duas vezes em missões de planejamento e comprado sua passagem de volta a Copenhague. Um ano depois, Westergaard teve a sorte de escapar de outra ameaça a sua vida. O artista, de 73 anos, estava assistindo a um filme com sua neta pequena quando um somali com um machado invadiu sua casa para matá-lo. Ele se refugiou em um quarto de segurança que se vira obrigado a construir. Durante uma década, nós tivemos de viver à sombra de tais ameaças, depois que encomendei uma dúzia de charges retratando Maomé. Foi essa decisão que provocou uma tempestade ao redor do mundo, com a republicação das charges em vários outros jornais. Apesar das tentativas de assassinato, era muito fácil, à medida que a vida seguia, ser levado a acreditar que a ameaça era abstrata.”
Read more